.
Feedback

Massapequa School Board Candidate: Joseph Marsh

Patch speaks with the Massapequa BOE trustee candidate.

This is the second of a series of candidate profiles that will appear on Massapequa Patch. Stay with us for more profiles leading up to Tuesday's election.

Joseph Marsh is a candidate in the May 15 Massapequa School Board election

He has been a resident of Massapequa for 12 years and has three children. Two of those children are currently in the school system, one is about to enter the system.

Marsh owns a technology and management consulting company and has been a member of the school district's budget and finance committee for six years.

We recently sat down with Marsh and heard some of his opinions on the issues facing voters.

On his mixed feelings about the tax cap:

"The administration is not doing its job. It's incapable of meeting its runaway budget. Apparently, it's not just our own district, It's school districts across the state. What the administration has gotten good at is getting their budgets passed, normally by holding arts, music and sports hostage. [The administration argues] 'If we don't get the whole budget, then you don't get your football team.' So I'm a fan of the tax cap, if only because it's finally starting to get people's attention. We shouldn't need it. But if the administration were doing its job, it wouldn't matter to us. So I hope in five years, when the tax cap expires, it goes away."

On financial issues facing the district: 

"We spend $183 million and we've got 7,800 kids. The budget is going up. The student population is going down. Yet the student results aren't also going up. So I ask the question: How much is too much? How much money do we need? What is the cost of educating the student or 7,800 students? We don't know and the answer that the public is seeing is the budget growing by over $20 million over the last four years."

"The other part of this, is we spend so much time talking about money. At some point you want to say,  'We want to achieve educational excellence.' And the answer is not let's throw more money at it."

On transparency in the district:

"The culture in the district is is very insular. This is driven from the highest levels and we want to open that up...What we hear from the administration is, 'We know the answer. Thank you for your input, but we don't really need it.'"

On the elimination of positions:

"I thought it was a little backwards, the fact that 29 teachers got cut and only three administrative positions got cut."

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Massapequa Patch? Find your Local Patch »

tony May 13, 2012 at 04:21 pm
Ther is np doubt,Joseph is a qualified candidate for the position and an involved Massapequa resident on school matters. However, making blanket statements about the administration (.... is not doing its job..... is incapable.... you don't get a football team...) without stating specifics is misleading. Also every resident receives a School budget proposal notice and it indicates what NYS REQUIRES to be eliminated when a budget fails to pass. If those requirements are not sufficient, cuts have to be made in areas outside the core educational programs. It is possible that sports programs would have to be reduced. I have been an involved resident since 1966 regarding school matters. Yes, Joseph is right to a point, past administration have made statements about cutting sport programs. This present administration to the best of my knowledge has not used these proposals. I did hear statement about cutting full day Kindergarten.This administration has answeed every question I have asked,. I may not have liked the answers, but they were accepted by me. I wish Joseph presented his program to help, instead of just criticizing the MSD.
broke taxpayer May 13, 2012 at 09:51 pm
Tony you may have had your questions answered by many of us have not. I for one am tired of people saying we can not criticize. Why not if we disagree? Isn't this America where everyone is entitled to their own opinion? You don't have to agree with it but he has every right to be critical if he is not happy with the answers, or lack of answers. If he doesn't get info how can he.give you details? Now you sound like administration.
tony May 14, 2012 at 12:33 am
Please indicate where Joseph has stated any program he will put forth?. That is all I am questioning. Can he back up the negative statements he made? Joseph is a good person, but Broke Taxpayert I don't like name calling or opinions which have no basis in fact. Broke Taxpayer you can ask any question at the end of every public board meeting and you can also Question Mr Adcock by e-mail. He has never failed to answer my inquires.. You sound like you have already made up your mind and a closed mind will not gain any knowledge.
broke taxpayer May 14, 2012 at 03:21 am
I have a very open mind. I don't find Mr. marsh to be negative. That is exactly the problem in this district. God forbid you suggest something isn't working. We can criticize and still have an open mind. Joe can suggest we try a new direction without you labeling him a name caller. I've heard him speak and I've heard his questions at board meetings. He is not negative but asks good valid questions but doesn't receive valid answers. Maybe he asks more probing and difficult questions than you.
tony May 14, 2012 at 04:26 am
Your bias against even in thinking that i question Josephs ability to probe and ask questions . Did you read and understand what I wrote? you do not have an open mind. All Joseoh expresses is his dissatisfaction with the MSD. I am simply asking where are his programs or solutions? He has 6 years on the budget committee and very involved in the PTA. He should have some good ideas, which he should state publicly. I will repeat again , his statements are negative. I will also repeat where is the basis for some of the statements he did make like ( is not doing its job..... is incapable.... you don't get a football team...) I am not happy about the property taxes I pay but i accept the increases of about 2% the past few years because it is about what all costs have risen..
Dianne Sheffield May 14, 2012 at 06:19 pm
I reviewed the numbers listed in Newsday for our administration. In the 2009-10 school year we had 5 top administrators making $1,139224. Two years later in the 2011-12 school year it is 6 administrators costing $1,372,311, an increase of $233,087, or 20%! How many teachers could we have saved with $233K?
Our Superintendent's compensation has increased by $37,184 or 12% in those 2 years. Asst Superintendent for Business - $25,110 or 10% and another Asst Superintendent $26,336 or 12%. Taxpayers, ask yourselves - have you and your families gotten these kinds of increases? I know I haven't and my neighbors haven't. Ask yourselves - can we afford more of these kinds of raises? I say NO! Look for yourselves. Go to Newsday and see the LONG list of administrators and how much they make. Compare that to other districts. You have a choice tomorrow. You can vote for more of the same and re-elect Mary Ann Fisher and Joe LaBella, both supported by the unions. You can vote for Rich Carozza who has NEVER attended a Board of Education meeting. Or....
Dianne Sheffield May 14, 2012 at 06:20 pm
You can vote for two people who have attended meetings, asked questions and have grown frustrated with the lack of answers - Joseph Marsh and Dianne Sheffield.
Joseph and I will represent ALL taxpayers who want to have their voice heard. We do not believe that by asking questions and being critical of things we believe are wrong, we are dividing the community. We believe that a responsible board member does not approve what is put in front of them by the board, but asks questions to make sure they understand what they are voting for and believe it is in the best interest of the community. Joseph and I do not believe that is currently happening in Massapequa. We ask for your support so we can help change the tone of board meeting to be one where the community can get information about how their tax dollars are spent and their children educated. We want transparency and openness so that we as a community can come together and share our ideas. Together we are stronger than any individual. Please support Marsh and Sheffield tomorrow.
tony May 14, 2012 at 06:40 pm
Diane, I feel like you have already made your excuses for the 2013-2114 budget if you are elected. with your" It is what it is" statement. You served many years as an Auditor for MSD. You have stated you brought forth possible improprieties within the MSD. Why did you accept answers that you state were " be quiet " type of attitude? Why not seek transparency at that time? I would have fully supported your aim.. You are a qualified candidate, my hope if elected you realize that reducing administrative salaries or positions by One Million dollars will not solve our budget problems. What other proposals do you plan to announce before Tuesday?
Dianne Sheffield May 14, 2012 at 08:16 pm
Tony see my comment under todays article.
tony May 14, 2012 at 09:41 pm
ok
tony May 15, 2012 at 12:29 am
Why put down Teachers? Residents of Massapequa Park have decent earnings. Since the average is higher then the median $ 116,000 it means more people are earnig income much higher then $ 125,000. I can have but you can't opinions of the comments made on Patch are shameful.
Massapequa Park INCOME OVERVIEW Income details Average Household Income 125,979 Average Household Size (people) 2.93 Average HH Net Worth 1,102,047 Per capita income 43,261 Median Disposable Income 80,983
cc May 15, 2012 at 05:43 am
Tony, you keep posting these figures, but it's rather pointless. The bigger questions you should be asking as a taxpayer and voter are:
1. How is the $183 million going to be spent? 2. How come they are laying off teachers when this town has consistently passed their budget and increased it year after year (you still believe it's the 2% tax cap)? 3. Why didn't the administration make any internal cuts (within the administration)? 4. What are Charles Sulc's credentials that qualify him for such a lucrative package? 5. While he's blaming the pensions...do YOU personally know they only actually account for a mere $11 million total? 6. Do YOU actually know how much the district spends on sports ($1.5 million)? 7. Do you even know how many total employees there are in the district? 8. Do you know how many administrators there are and what their combined total salaries amount to? 9. Do you have any clue where all this money is actually going? Start with that and maybe, just maybe you can effectively be part of a serious discussion around here!
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
LT June 16, 2013 at 09:52 am
when you say elite do you mean the hard working people who have money? it's a matter of labels. youRead More call them elite..they call themselves hard workers. yes, some inherit money. but most of us work for it.
Michael Taustine June 16, 2013 at 09:01 pm
No, it has nothing to do with how hard you work. It's just that the elite one percenters are treatedRead More differently when they run afoul of the laws in this country. No one has been jailed for the corporate malfeasance that resulted in the financial crash of '08, in spite of the rules that were ignored or broken. Too big to fail is the order of the day. Meanwhile, petty frauds committed by poor and middle class are prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Two Americas. The rule of law, unevenly applied, whether by race, or class, or economic station will result in the unraveling of society. We may well be seeing the beginnings of that now, as we've entered a new gilded age, where new robber barons are allowed to run roughshod over the lower classes. The very ideals of America are at stake, and we are letting them slide away.
Jack coyote June 12, 2013 at 03:24 pm
Will the new Massapequa station platform be covered end-to-end as it is now? If it will only beRead More partially covered, like Seaford station, there are going to be a lot of cold, wet, unhappy commuters.
Patrick O'Hara June 12, 2013 at 04:14 pm
Mr. Coyote, The design plans only call for a canopy over certain parts of the station platform, likeRead More almost all of the other stations along the branch. The canopies will be primarily over the staircases, elevator, waiting room, and one other small section on the middle section of the platform between the elevator and east escalator.
mj June 12, 2013 at 01:43 pm
Also blocks along Alhambra Road including Granada and Sutton. It rained the other day and was up toRead More the front lawn on one house that is still being renovated from Sandy!!!! Horrible if those owners saw this.